|
From: | Kelly Dean |
Subject: | Is setq-default within a dynamic let-binding supposed to work? |
Date: | Thu, 05 Feb 2015 03:09:44 +0000 |
(let ((foo 'bar)) (setq-default foo 'baz)) foo → Lisp error: (void-variable foo) Is that behavior correct? Or maybe you're not supposed to do that, and the behavior is undefined?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |