[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defending GCC considered futile
|
From: |
Helmut Eller |
|
Subject: |
Re: Defending GCC considered futile |
|
Date: |
Mon, 09 Feb 2015 08:41:23 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, Feb 08 2015, Richard Stallman wrote:
> The question at hand is not about LLVM, or GCC. It is whether to
> install support for something called LLDB. What exactly is LLDB?
LLDB is a debugger, written by the folks behind LLVM. LLDB is linked to
Clang/LLVM to parse C expressions and to generate code if necessary.
Everybody who supports LLDB indirectly supports LLVM.
Helmut
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, (continued)
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Florian Weimer, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, raman, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/11
Re: Defending GCC considered futile,
Helmut Eller <=
Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Florian Weimer, 2015/02/09
Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/02/09