SOAP, WSDL

[Ivan Shmakov]

>>>>> Michael Albinus <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> Thomas Fitzsimmons <address@hidden> writes:

 >> If you can provide the hacked and unhacked Debbugs.wsdl I can try
 >> them out in the test suite.  We'll also need to retest "live"
 >> debbugs-gnu carefully as part of the merge to check for regressions.

 > Well, there isn't such a thing like "unhacked Debbugs.wsdl".  When I
 > started to write debbugs.el, I had also to write Debbugs.wsdl from
 > scratch, because it didn't exist.  The BTS guys use Perl's SOAP::Lite
 > module, no need for a *.wsdl file therefore.

        … Which brings this long unasked question of mine: why can’t we
        just have soap-lite.el, too?  And thus cease to bother about
        either Debbugs.wsdl, /or/ WSDL support in soap-client.el in
        general – in the cases the service at hand doesn’t happen to
        provide a ready to use WSDL file.

        (I’m not a SOAP expert, but I’ve got an impression that WSDL is
        an entirely separate layer used over “plain” SOAP.)

[…]

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  http://boycottsystemd.org/  … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A