[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defending GCC considered futile
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: Defending GCC considered futile |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:30:15 +0100 |
* Richard Stallman:
> > Speking as the original author of GUD, I'm in favor of it supporting
> > LLVM and everything else imaginable.
>
> The question at hand is not about LLVM, or GCC. It is whether to
> install support for something called LLDB. What exactly is LLDB?
It's the system debugger on MacOS X.
“With the release of Xcode 5, the LLDB debugger becomes the foundation
for the debugging experience on OS X.”
<https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/IDEs/Conceptual/gdb_to_lldb_transition_guide/document/Introduction.html>
It's difficult to understand why LLDB support is unacceptable, but
MacOS X support is fine.
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, (continued)
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Florian Weimer, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, raman, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/11
Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Helmut Eller, 2015/02/09
Re: Defending GCC considered futile,
Florian Weimer <=
Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/02/09