[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Character group folding in searches
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Character group folding in searches |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:45:09 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:15:21 -0500
>
> > Why should we? "->" could be equivalent to ?→, but I see no reason to
> > make it equivalent to "=>".
>
> The me the question goes the other way: how can you be sure noone will
> ever need/want equivalence classes which include things like "->" and
> "=>" at the same time?
When they do, we will indeed want your DFAs ;-)
Seriously, though: the real question here is whether this limitation
is serious enough to render the entire idea useless. I don't think
so, I think the use-case you envision is rare at best.
> But I don't have any immediate plans to work on this, no.
Damn!
- Re: Character group folding in searches, (continued)
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/07
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/07
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/07
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/08
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/08
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/08
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/09
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/09
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/09
- Re: Character group folding in searches, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/09
- Re: Character group folding in searches,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Character group folding in searches, Juri Linkov, 2015/02/06