[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker
|
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
|
Subject: |
Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:53:39 +0000 |
On Feb 22, 2015 7:23 PM, "Dmitry Gutov" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 02/23/2015 12:03 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>> I consider it good practice to use #'<name> rather than '<name> when
>> referring to a function rather than to a symbol (tho it's not used very
>> widely right now).
>
>
> It's been gaining in popularity recently.
>
> https://github.com/bbatsov/emacs-lisp-style-guide/commit/26a37b77af54614a41437906f8062fb1744e5889
Not to mention Emacs source should try to set an example. So IMO, yes, please do that.
- Re: Why is Elisp's defvar weird? And is eval_sub broken?, (continued)
- Re: Why is Elisp's defvar weird? And is eval_sub broken?, Kelly Dean, 2015/02/17
- Re: Why is Elisp's defvar weird? And is eval_sub broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/18
- Re: Why is Elisp's defvar weird? And is eval_sub broken?, Kelly Dean, 2015/02/19
- Re: Why is Elisp's defvar weird? And is eval_sub broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/19
- Re: Why is Elisp's defvar weird? And is eval_sub broken?, Kelly Dean, 2015/02/19
- Re: Why is Elisp's defvar weird? And is eval_sub broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/19
- Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker, Kelly Dean, 2015/02/21
- Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/22
- Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/22
- Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/02/22
- Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/23
- Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/22
- Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker, Artur Malabarba, 2015/02/28