[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r.
|
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
|
Subject: |
Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:52:07 -0300 |
> Just one thing, though, since `number-sequence' is also defined in
> subr.el, I'd have to wrap it in `eval-and-compile' to be able to use it
> in my macros.
I don't understand. Why is that?
Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/03/12
Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2015/03/11
- Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/03/11
- Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r.,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/03/12
- Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Artur Malabarba, 2015/03/12
Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/12
Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/03/13
RE: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Drew Adams, 2015/03/13
Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/13
Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/03/13
Re: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r., Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/13