|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: giving `setq-local' the same signature as `setq' |
Date: | Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:24:17 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I’ve often run into an issue when assuming `setq-local’ behave like > `setq’ by accepting multiple [SYM VAL] pairs and returning the value > assigned to the last symbol rather than only accepting one symbol and > one value. I find this behavior of `setq' to be a misfeature, which is why I haven't adopted it for setq-local. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |