Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?

[martin rudalics]

>> Then the second incarnation of p-r-f will have to move the window's
>> point to the start or end of the intangible area, whichever is nearer
>> to the window point established by redisplay.  Or do I miss something?
>
> More important than "nearer" would be "after window-start and before
> window-end" to avoid inf-looping.

Yes.  As I said before: "Handling the intangible property makes IMO
sense only after redisplay has determined the start/point/end positions
of the window."
>
>> Strictly spoken I see no reason why the display engine should not handle
>> that property by itself.
>
> It's complicated enough as it is.

Maybe you're right.

martin