[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC mode and git
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: VC mode and git |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:29:46 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 |
On 03/24/2015 12:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:05:33 +0100
>>
>> I think that the real conclusion of the discussion is: shouldn't vc-dir
>> have a command to push? And, to that, I guess most of us would answer
>> yes, right?
>
> A related question is: does "C-x v v" at all make sense with Git and
> other dVCSes? If it does, what would be the DWIM cycle there? E.g.,
> would it make sense for "C-x v v" to push when the previous action was
> commit and there are not uncommitted changes?
C-x v v should never push. That would be too surprising to user used to
working locally.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: VC mode and git, Andreas Schwab, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, Sebastien Vauban, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/26
Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/25