[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC mode and git
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: VC mode and git |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:01:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Stephen J. Turnbull <address@hidden>:
> Perhaps rather than assuming a universal meaning for DWIM, C-x v v
> could implement a limited concept of "workflow". Eg, a workflow could
> be modeled by a list ((LEXP1 OP1) (LEXP2 OP2) ...), and the workflow
> would be implemented something like
>
> (catch 'done
> (mapc (lambda (kv)
> (let ((lexp (first kv))
> (op (second kv)))
> (if (eval lexp) (throw (funcall op)))))))
>
> A couple of default workflows could be provided.
That sounds like lots of complexity for small gain to me.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: VC mode and git, (continued)
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/29
Re: VC mode and git, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/24
Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/26
Re: VC mode and git, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/26
Re: VC mode and git, Steinar Bang, 2015/03/25
Re: VC mode and git, Mark H Weaver, 2015/03/26