[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC mode and git
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: VC mode and git |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:37:15 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 |
On 04/01/2015 03:34 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Ricardo.
>
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 09:50:46PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
>> Alan Mackenzie writes:
>
>>> The only combination that makes sense to me is that which involves the
>>> least risk and the least time and effort wasted in ploughing through
>>> git's inadequate documentation. I don't want to spend several hours
>>> learning how to "throw away commits while keeping the changes using
>>> interactive rebasing", or even in learning what that all really means. I
>>> am one of these seemingly rare people who are not fascinated by the
>>> innards of git, and simply want an appropriate tool for communicating
>>> changes from and to savannah. I know I'm not the only one. I think you
>>> have trouble accepting this position.
>
>> I'm not "fascinated by the innards of git" and I don't find the man
>> pages very useful, but creating commits often and interactively rebasing
>> them before publishing (i.e. "git push") lies at the core of my
>> workflow, and I would not do it if it wasn't easy and convenient.
>
> Is having to invent a meaningful commit message for each and every commit
> not inconvenient?
Half of mine are "asdf". Of course I provide meaningful messages for
commits I push, but local ones? Nah.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: VC mode and git, (continued)
Re: VC mode and git, Steinar Bang, 2015/04/01
Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/04/01
Re: VC mode and git, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/04/01
Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/01
Re: VC mode and git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2015/04/02
Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/02
Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/02