|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 2056db3: Rationalize use of c[ad]+r, expunging cl-c[ad]\{3, 4\}r. |
Date: | Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:35:24 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> But seeing cl-caddr in source raises the subliminal question "what's > it got that caddr doesn't?" Well what it does have is that it exists, contrary to caddr. Of course, in most cases (cl-)caddr is better written "nth 2". > Let's just put them all in subr.el, then. All the cXXr definitions would > then be together. The defaliases can stay in cl-lib.el. I can't think > of anything that might go wrong. Nothing would go wrong. I'm just not yet convinced that it's a change for the better. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |