Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 2056db3: Rationalize use of c[ad]+r, expunging cl-c[ad]\{3, 4\}r.

[Stefan Monnier]

> But seeing cl-caddr in source raises the subliminal question "what's
> it got that caddr doesn't?"

Well what it does have is that it exists, contrary to caddr.
Of course, in most cases (cl-)caddr is better written "nth 2".

> Let's just put them all in subr.el, then.  All the cXXr definitions would
> then be together.  The defaliases can stay in cl-lib.el.  I can't think
> of anything that might go wrong.

Nothing would go wrong.  I'm just not yet convinced that it's a change
for the better.


        Stefan