[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stash
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Stash |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:20:28 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> If the conflict is between the incoming branch and uncommitted changes
> in the workspace, the requested merge fails git's preconditions and
> does not even start. No files in the workspace are touched, no commit
> objects are created, and the HEAD pointer is not moved.
> Some people (who I believe are not native speakers) have called both
> non-success modes "failure".
Both of them are failures, because in both cases the pull doesn't do
its intended job of bringing in the latest changes so you can commit
something correct.
I will not let the Git developers redefine one of these failure modes
as a kind of success. I will continue to refer to them both as failures.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
Re: Stash, Richard Stallman, 2015/04/06
- Re: Stash, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/06
- Re: Stash, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2015/04/06
- Re: Stash, Richard Stallman, 2015/04/07
- Re: Stash, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/07
- Re: Stash, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/07
- Re: Stash,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Stash, Richard Stallman, 2015/04/08
Re: Stash, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/08
Re: Stash, Richard Stallman, 2015/04/09
Re: Stash, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/09
Re: Stash, Richard Stallman, 2015/04/10
Re: Stash, Richard Stallman, 2015/04/08
Re: Stash, Andreas Schwab, 2015/04/07
Re: Stash, Richard Stallman, 2015/04/08
Re: Stash, Andreas Schwab, 2015/04/09
Re: Stash, Richard Stallman, 2015/04/10