[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: map.el and naming
|
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
|
Subject: |
Re: map.el and naming |
|
Date: |
Sun, 12 Apr 2015 00:12:51 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
On 04/11/2015 08:34 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> So you would have e.g. `mapping-map' and `mapping-map-keys'. It loses
>> some of the nice concision of "map" (and of course "map" still shows up
>> twice), but it doesn't seem too bad to me.
>
> To catch on, it's very important for the prefix to be short. So I think
> "mapping-" won't do.
"dict-" is short. "Dictionary" is another well-known name for a mapping
data structure.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: map.el and naming, John Yates, 2015/04/11
Re: map.el and naming, John Mastro, 2015/04/11
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/11
- Re: map.el and naming,
Daniel Colascione <=
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Nicolas Petton, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Yuri Khan, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Nicolas Petton, 2015/04/12