[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: commit-msg hook
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: commit-msg hook |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:09:42 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:01:12 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
>
> On 04/14/2015 08:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > + non_print =
> > "[\1-\37\177]|\302[\200-\237]|\355([\240-\257]|[\260-\277])[\200-\277]"
>
> This sort of thing should work in a unibyte environment, but it needs to
> be used only after testing that we actually are in a unibyte environment.
I thought that's what all the tests with cent_sign and at_sign do,
don't they?
Anyway, what bad things could happen if this regular expression is
used in a multibyte environment?
- Re: commit-msg hook, (continued)
- Re: commit-msg hook, Paul Eggert, 2015/04/11
- Re: commit-msg hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/11
- Re: commit-msg hook, Paul Eggert, 2015/04/11
- Re: commit-msg hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/12
- Re: commit-msg hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/13
- Re: commit-msg hook, Paul Eggert, 2015/04/13
- Re: commit-msg hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/13
- Re: commit-msg hook, Paul Eggert, 2015/04/13
- Re: commit-msg hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/14
- Re: commit-msg hook, Paul Eggert, 2015/04/14
- Re: commit-msg hook,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: commit-msg hook, Paul Eggert, 2015/04/14
- Re: commit-msg hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/14
- Re: commit-msg hook, Paul Eggert, 2015/04/14
- Re: commit-msg hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/14