Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 04/20/2015 07:20 PM, Glenn Morris wrote:
> I suppose I could (in my Gnus) score down every mail on that list,
> and score up "master", but I'd appreciate it if people would use a
> standard namespace for such branches. Some people use "scratch/", which
> seems sensible to me. (But there's also one "fix/" and one "feature/" ...)

I think scratch/ prefix was designated for short-lived branches, later 
to be amended and/or rebased.

If the branch contents are simply merged, will the mailed send out the 
contents of every commit therein again?