Re: Is there a way to inhibit message3 from Elisp?

[Oleh Krehel]

Artur Malabarba <address@hidden> writes:

>> Updated etc/NEWS and the manual (entry for `message').
>> Let me know if it's OK to merge.
>
> Now that I think about it, the really ideal way to do this would be to
> have a with-no-messages macro/special form, so that stupid packages
> can't setq this variable permanently. 
>
> But if that's too impractical, the current version is fine.

I'm not sure if it's possible or practical.  message3 is in C, so there
would need to be an Elisp variable that connects the macro and the C
code.

In any case, there's already a good way to deal with stupid packages.

Oleh