[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs author stats
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs author stats |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:27:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
> "Uhm… Well, attracting droves of new developers didn’t happen, apparently.
> Except for the spike the month git was introduced, we’re within the normal
> range of developers, I think.
>
> So… was the changeover worth it? Probably. But the impact was a bit over-sold
> on both sides, I think."
You really need to wait a bit more before making judgments on whether it was
worthwhile or not. People are still getting used to the change, and many
people haven't even heard of it (I hadn't until a few weeks ago!).
John
- Emacs author stats, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Emacs author stats, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Artur Malabarba, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Artur Malabarba, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Peder O. Klingenberg, 2015/04/24
- Re: Emacs author stats, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/24