[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs author stats
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs author stats |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:48:10 +0100 |
2015-04-23 18:49 GMT+01:00 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:
>> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
>> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:41:03 +0200
>>
>> I wondered whether switching to git had any effect, developer wise, so I
>> whipped up some stats:
>>
>> http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2015/04/23/the-effect-of-version-control-systems-on-emacs-developers/
>
> Thanks.
>
> This part warrants a comment:
>
> [...] I would suspect that the numbers before, say, 2007 are
> suspect because maintainers would commit patches with themselves as
> the “author”, I think.
>
> This suspicion is not true: whoever committed the changes even back
> then, always mentioned the actual author.
Either way, I think the relevant metric is precisely the number of
*committers*. Commiters are the ones most affected by this change.
Authors who submit patches and bug fixes couldn't care less whether we
use bzr or git (or do I misunderstand something?).
- Emacs author stats, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, John Wiegley, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: Emacs author stats, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Artur Malabarba, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Peder O. Klingenberg, 2015/04/24
- Re: Emacs author stats, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/24
- Re: Emacs author stats, chad, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/23
Re: Emacs author stats, Artur Malabarba, 2015/04/23