Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 05/05/2015 01:21 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:

> If we agree to implement a `next-error-priority', then perhaps
> `next-error-find-buffer' should penalize buried buffers by subtracting
> from their priority.  Thus buffers most recently buried will have the
> lowest priority.

Well yes, if we add a new variable buffers like *compile* set, we could 
detect them easily. And if we not only penalized but also removed 
buffers with priority 0, the list should be short enough.

But would we really have any priority values aside from 0 and 100? I 
think it makes sense for a buffer to only contain errors for itself, or 
only for other buffers.