Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Tue, 5 May 2015 17:05:43 +0300 Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden> wrote: 

DG> On 05/05/2015 12:47 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> So far, we only know of those two cases, yes.  But we can adjust the
>> priority further by the buffer's stack position as I suggested above, or
>> by user-supplied criteria.  We could make it a floating-point value but
>> I'm not sure that would be a usability gain :)

DG> My instinct is to have a boolean var, and in case any new cases turn
DG> up, add a few new possible symbol values. For all we know, non-0,
DG> non-100 situations might not be easily described with a number.

Sound good to me :)

Ted