Re: etags test is broken on MS-Windows

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 10:02:52 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > This seems to say that such byte offsets are the only "right" ones.
> 
> Right.
> 
> > But we have just established that all of the byte offsets discussed
> > here, including the ones currently produced by etags, are wrong in
> 
> ??? etags _does_ produce byte offsets, currently.

The issue is their accuracy, not their existence or being byte
offsets.