[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string> missing?
|
From: |
Nick Andryshak |
|
Subject: |
Re: string> missing? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:46:44 -0400 |
> What would '(string> A B)' do that '(string< B A)' doesn't?
Functionally, nothing, but it seems silly to have only one without the
other, don't you think? Why would a language have '<' without '>'?
> With that argument, we'd also need string<= and string>=.
Nothing wrong with that.
- Nick
- string> missing?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?,
Nick Andryshak <=
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Andreas Schwab, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03