Re: string> missing?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Nick Andryshak <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:50:47 -0400
> 
> What good reasons are there specifically to keep the '>' function? What
> does '(> A B)' do that '(< B A)' doesn't?

If you want to argue for removal of one of them, feel free.

But that doesn't reflect in any way on the issue at hand.  Once again,
there's no requirement to be "consistent" in this sense.