Re: need for 'dynamical-let'?

[Dmitri Paduchikh]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>>> It seems that the situation with advices even worse than with macros. As
>>>> I understand it, the code of advice may be compiled at runtime but it is
>>>> unknown in what context compilation will be done.
SM>>> That's true for old-style `defadvice', but not for new-style
SM>>> `advice-add'.
>> Understood. Is it planned to obsolete `defadvice'?
SM> Yes,

Ah, thank you for clarifications.