[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:26:41 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> FWIW, this sucks because this method won't be used in modes derived from
>> emacs-lisp-mode.
> If we *really* wanted to use the same mechanism, though, I think
> implementing &context (derived-p emacs-lisp-mode) is not impossible.
I think the syntax "&context (derived-p emacs-lisp-mode)" is impossible,
but indeed, something that behaves correctly is possible, maybe with
a syntax like "&context ((parent-modes) (includes emacs-lisp-mode))"
or "&context (major-mode (derived-mode-of emacs-lisp-mode))".
Stefan
- cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/28
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/28
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/28
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/28
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/29
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/29
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/30