[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tooltips GC overhead
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Tooltips GC overhead |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Aug 2015 21:59:08 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 11:26:12 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Without some kind of quantitative criterion, this sounds irrational to
> > me.
>
> I don't know -- adding gingerbread to Fcons, even if it's a small
> inefficiency
> now, is likely to lead to greater inefficiencies later as it will place more
> design constraints on future attempts to improve performance.
Don't be ridiculous; all it takes is a single test followed by a
function call that is only made if the test succeeded (i.e. a profile
is in progress). We do that all the time, and no one has ever looked
back.
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, (continued)
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/04
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/04
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/08
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, David Kastrup, 2015/08/08
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Paul Eggert, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Nix, 2015/08/08
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/08
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, David Kastrup, 2015/08/08
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Nix, 2015/08/10
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, David Kastrup, 2015/08/10