Re: seq-some-p and nil

[Stefan Monnier]

> Two solutions come to my mind: 1) Make `seq-some-p' a pure t/nil
> predicate, or 2) Make it behave like `some' in Common Lisp, which is
> to return the first non-nil value which is returned by an invocation
> of the predicate. So in CL:

I think that functions named "<foo>-p" should return values which are
fundamentally booleans, but whose non-nil value is unspecified (they
can return any non-nil value they fancy and the callers should make
assumptions about that non-nil return value).

Other than that, the CL behavior looks sane to me.


        Stefan