[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: seq-some-p and nil
|
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
|
Subject: |
RE: seq-some-p and nil |
|
Date: |
Thu, 03 Sep 2015 21:36:03 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:
> And IMHO, it is better to reserve the suffix `-p' for a function
> that does not return an especially useful result, i.e., that
> really is used mainly or only as a predicate.
I agree, I will rename `seq-some-p' and `seq-contains-p' to `seq-some'
and `seq-contains'.
Cheers,
Nico
--
Nicolas Petton
http://nicolas-petton.fr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- seq-some-p and nil, Simen Heggestøyl, 2015/09/03
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/03
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Artur Malabarba, 2015/09/03
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Nicolas Petton, 2015/09/03
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Mark Oteiza, 2015/09/05
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Nicolas Petton, 2015/09/06
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/06
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Nicolas Petton, 2015/09/07
- RE: seq-some-p and nil, Drew Adams, 2015/09/07
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/07
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Mark Oteiza, 2015/09/07
- RE: seq-some-p and nil, Drew Adams, 2015/09/07
- Re: seq-some-p and nil, Nicolas Petton, 2015/09/07