Re: seq-some-p and nil

[Stefan Monnier]

>> If the function is not supposed to return non-nil if an element is
>> matched but the element itself, then would it be ok? OTOH there would be
>> again no way to differentiate between no element found and nil being
>> found in the sequence.

Returning what FUN returned seems like a better choice.

If you need the element matched, then you can simply arrange for FUN
to return the element.


        Stefan