Re: seq-some-p and nil

[David Kastrup]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>> then in most cases, I think the code ends up just as simple with
>>> seq-some as with seq-find.
> [...]
>> To make things easier to understand, I'm taking the example of finding
>> the first odd number in a seq:
>
> I've never needed to do that.

Marvelous.

-- 
David Kastrup