[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2015 06:28:41 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > No, another difference would be that NONE of the other options
> > is possible with one character -- all would require a toggle command
> > that people may not remember. (I don't.)
> NONE of what other options?
Currently you can type a single character and do any of these things:
* Search for A with or without any accent.
* Search for Á only.
* Search for À only.
* Search for  only.
* Search for Ä only.
and likewise for each accented variant of A that exists in Unicode.
With your change, all of those characters would do the same thing:
search for A with or without any accent.
So there would be only one thing you can do in regard to searching for As,
without using some sort of toggling command.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/11
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/11
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/08