[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New maintainer
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: New maintainer |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 20:14:38 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:05:48 -0400
>
> > All true and agreed, but _some_ minimally useful degree of technical
> > knowledge is required for the decision making.
>
> We can't expect the impossible. A perfect Emacs maintainer would be
> familiar with all the code in Emacs. We won't find a person like
> that, but Stefan has shown that a less-than-perfect maintainer can do
> a good job.
No disagreement here, neither in principle nor wrt Stefan's work.
The issue is merely how to organize the maintainership, and how to
define the division of responsibilities with c-maintainers, if there
will be such.
- Re: New maintainer, (continued)
- Re: New maintainer, David De La Harpe Golden, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08