Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>  address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 22:43:20 +0300
> 
> Further, creating a new binding for `vc-commit' looks like a 
> half-measure. If we intend it to be used more, it should occupy the 
> easier to hit key sequence (C-x v v).

v and c are neighbors, so I don't see why "C-x v c" would be hard.

> If we agree on that, there are several options for vc-next-action. 
> Either find it a new binding, or remove its binding altogether a take 
> care of locking backends some other way

I ask once again why not make vc-next-action support some simple
workflow with modern VCSes.

> To my (obviously) limited knowledge, RMS is the only user of a locking 
> backend, and so far he hasn't answered the pertinent question about his 
> workflow.

If by "locking VCS" you mean RCS, then I use it from time to time.