Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden,  
> address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 23:34:06 -0400
> 
> > that is no longer true.  Why doesn't vc-next-action succeed in
> > determining that what you want to do is a commit?
>   
> It does.  It's just that it doesn't determine that what you want to do
> is something else.  So let's stop pretending and let's just call it
> "vc-commit".

But when there's nothing to commit, I'd expect vc-next-action to
update from upstream.  So calling it "vc-commit" would be wrong, and
removing the update (a.k.a. "checkout") part from it would also be
wrong, IMO.