[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: burden of maintainance
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: burden of maintainance |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Oct 2015 21:08:13 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 19:19:31 +0200
> From: Andreas Röhler <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> >> If there is no test, writing the test before any other proceeding should
> >> save a lot of time.
> > I agree. The problem is in practice, not in principle.
> >
> >
>
> What about creating a co-maintainance WRT code-quality?
Good idea. We will need a clear description of the job and one or
more volunteers.
- Re: burden of maintainance, (continued)
- Re: burden of maintainance, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Xue Fuqiao, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Xue Fuqiao, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: burden of maintainance, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/08