|
| From: | Artur Malabarba |
| Subject: | Re: ELPA contributions? |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:42:27 +0100 |
The takeaway message is: Yes the readme could use some improvements.
On 9 Oct 2015 9:32 am, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've taken a look at elpa.gnu.org and the README referenced in there,
> and at lists.gnu.org. There does not appear to be a discussion list for
> ELPA,
There isn't. Elpa stuff is discussed on the emacs lists. But the Readme should certainly say that.
> and the README just contains the technical details of uploading
> material to ELPA (it's not really clear when to choose an external
> branch).
Yes, that needs to be clarified too. The idea is to just use a subtree, unless you _know_ you want an external branch for some reason.
> There are no obvious submission addresses or anything like
> that.
Yes, that should just be Emacs-devel as well.
> One just dumps his stuff in there in case one happens to be an Emacs
> developer?
I don't understand this sentence. Dumps their stuff on elpa.git? What does this have to do with being a developer?
Cheers,
Artur
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |