[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:15:07 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 |
On 10/10/2015 02:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Are you saying that high-level design is generally not useful, and
should be avoided, unless "justified"?
A justification would further the discussion. Simply asking for a big
design, doesn't.
If Company's tooltip is not pleasant, what would be pleasant for
you?
I just gave you 2 examples.
You didn't explain how they are better.
And it's not really about me, it's about the expectations of users out
there. Don't they expect something they see elsewhere?
Sometimes. A common question is for a popup that doesn't conflict with
other packages that use overlay rendering for other things.
Did you also mean this aspect?
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, martin rudalics, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, martin rudalics, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/12