[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:14:25 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Cc: John Wiegley <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 21:07:50 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> From: "John Wiegley" <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:31:13 -0700
> >>
> >> To reiterate: I think Emacs becomes more of an IDE when it provides
> >> the backbone of an IDE, and not when it looks like one.
> >
> > I don't think this will fly. In effect, you are telling Emacs users
> > they will have to code their own IDE by using the infrastructure
> > (a.k.a. "backbone") that we provide.
>
> I don't see that. He is telling Emacs developers they'll be able to
> rely on common infrastructure for creating an IDE catered to some
> particular language/system.
OK, but IMO we should aim for more than that. What John wrote sounded
like providing the infrastructure _is_ the goal. Apologies if I
misunderstood.
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/13
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, raman, 2015/10/10