[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:31:57 +0300 |
> From: Steinar Bang <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:12:22 +0200
>
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:
>
> > To me, an IDE is not a set of functionalities. It's a coherent
> > application that provides an IDE-like look-and-feel, and all the
> > related functions already integrated and ready for me to be used.
> > That includes window-layout, btw, because configuring Emacs windows
> > for IDE-like behavior is an exceedingly complex task, one that's
> > impossible without good command of ELisp.
>
> Ah, there we differ. I don't care about the layout and would feel
> constrained in that layout.
>
> But I do want the functionalities.
The interesting question is what the youngsters want (or expect) these
days. You and me are sold long ago.
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/13
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, raman, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/15