Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language

[Marcin Borkowski]

On 2015-10-12, at 22:11, John Wiegley <address@hidden> wrote:

> If that Lisp can get close enough to Emacs Lisp, so that knowing one means
> knowing the other, we've just made it easier for anyone to write what we now
> have to write in C.

By no means am I an expert on this, but isn't "close enough, yet not
identical" a recipe for nasty bugs?

> I can imagine that complex things, like type declarations, would be done with
> anti-quoted blocks, or by direct support for inclusion of header files.
>
> John

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University