|
From: | John Yates |
Subject: | Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language |
Date: | Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:52:34 -0400 |
Oleh Krehel <address@hidden> writes:
> For exactly this reason (the confusion over 3 notations, 2 of which are
> the same), I propose that we stick only to "const char *" and "char * const",
> and don't use "char const *".
This seems a good idea to me. It would be nice for this convention to
be documented somewhere. I think this can be defined in GNU coding
standards. Can you send this suggestion to address@hidden?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |