Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language

[Mathieu Lirzin]

Oleh Krehel <address@hidden> writes:

> For exactly this reason (the confusion over 3 notations, 2 of which are
> the same), I propose that we stick only to "const char *" and "char * const",
> and don't use "char const *".

This seems a good idea to me.  It would be nice for this convention to
be documented somewhere.  I think this can be defined in GNU coding
standards.  Can you send this suggestion to address@hidden

Thanks,

--
Mathieu Lirzin