RE: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language

[Drew Adams]

> The C we have works for us, so this idea is pretty low priority. As you
> wrote in another thread, there are several, higher priority items that
> would win us more contributors faster (documentation, etc). Even changing
> from C to a Lisp would not be a silver bullet: the display code would
> still be a hard problem to solve.

And yet the thread goes on.  Lower priority, little light.