[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making --with-wide-int the default
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Making --with-wide-int the default |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:06:00 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:18:26 +0200
>
> Instead of going to 64-bit unilaterally it would seem to make more sense
> to me to degrade gracefully into gmp.
How can GMP help extend the maximum size of buffers and strings beyond
what a 32-bit EMACS_INT allows?
And how can GMP be faster than (or even close to) the native 64-bit
integral types supported by the C compiler?
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, (continued)
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Paul Eggert, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Paul Eggert, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Paul Eggert, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Philipp Stephani, 2015/10/15