Re: beginning-of-defun (again)

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> Is there a specific practical reason why it is important for the defuns in
> init.el not to start in column 0?

They are within macros controlling whether they are evaluated or compiled or
not, based on available packages on the system.

I'm not particularly disturbed by the fact that beginning-of-defun doesn't
work for these functions, however. I was just saying that we shouldn't make
assumptions.

John