Re: streams are cool, you could stream virtually anything!

[Nicolas Petton]

John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:


> So let's say I've written a function over lists, and I realize I want it to
> act on streams instead. I'd hope that I could just insert "stream-" in several
> places and fulfill that need. If I have to also change over to a different set
> of names for the same effective operations, that would be unfortunate.

That's exactly why I did seq.el! :-)

It doesn't have `seq-first' and `seq-rest' though, but I could very well
add them.  The only thing we will have to know is that `seq-rest' will
be more expensive on arrays than lists and streams.

Cheers,
Nico

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature