emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 29c360e: Ensure redisplay after "C-x C-e"


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 29c360e: Ensure redisplay after "C-x C-e"
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 21:25:23 +0200

> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 18:30:52 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> > Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:11:43 +0000
> > From: Artur Malabarba <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, emacs-devel <address@hidden>
> > 
> > 2015-11-06 15:30 GMT+00:00 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:
> > >> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:53:01 +0000
> > >> From: Artur Malabarba <address@hidden>
> > >> Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, emacs-devel <address@hidden>
> > >>
> > >> > "C-x C-e"
> > >>
> > >> C-x C-e is not the only way to evaluate arbitrary lisp code, there are
> > >> plenty of others (,
> > >> eval-expression, etc).
> > >
> > > Does any of them cause the problem I tried to fix?  IOW, if any of
> > > these include the form (setq line-spacing 1.0), does evaluating it
> > > fail to redraw the selected window with the new line-spacing?
> > 
> > eval-buffer, eval-region, and eval-defun all do (you have to invoke
> > them with keys, not with M-x).
> 
> Thanks, I will think about a solution to at least some of these.
> 
> But in any case, "C-x C-e" is frequently used to test the effect of a
> variable, so having at least that produce an immediate effect is IMO a
> Good Thing.

Do you like the changes in commit 19e09cf better?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]