Steinar Bang <
address@hidden> schrieb am So., 8. Nov. 2015 um 13:51 Uhr:
>>>>> Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>:
> Would you prefer this as one big patch, or as several smaller ones? A big
> patch would make it easier to see the code in context, but splitting it up
> might increase review speed.
Unless you have done strange rebasing on your git branch, but instead
used plain merges, then I would suggest doing a git merge instead of
using patches.
Fine with me, though that will likely produce lots of 'noise' commits because we weren't particularly strict about history cleanliness.